Home 5 News 5 New 2015-16 CDFA Agricultural Statistics

New 2015-16 CDFA Agricultural Statistics

Disclaimer

My opinions and perspectives may differ from the information provided on the product label. The product label should be considered the primary and authoritative source of information. It includes important instructions, warnings, ingredients, and usage guidelines that should be followed for safe and effective use of the product.

Every year California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) produces their yearly report which is always interesting although the amount of information can be overwhelming. Lots of food for thought to ponder with no pun intended:

  • The sales value generated by California agriculture decreased by 16.8 percent between the 2014 and 2015 crop years. The State’s 77,500 farms and ranches received $47.1 billion for their output, down from the $56.6 billion received in 2014.
  • California accounted for nearly 60 percent of the U.S. non-citrus fruit and nut production.     In total, California produced 16.2 million tons of fruits and nuts in 2015. The state’s total value of all fruits and nuts in 2015 was $18.1 billion.
  • California accounts for over 40 percent of the U.S. citrus production and 56 percent of the national value.
  • For the third year in a row, almonds were the number one valued fruit or nut crop, coming in at $5.3 billion in value for 2015. California is the number one producer of almonds in the world, with 67% of 2015 almond shipments exported.
  • Grapes were a close second at $5.0 billion. California grapes accounted for 89 percent of the United States utilized grape production in 2015.  Prices received by growers decreased from $756 per ton of grapes in 2014 to $724 per ton in 2015.
  • Crops with record California production in 2015 were blueberries, raspberries, strawberries, mandarins, dates and walnuts.
  • California accounted for all or nearly all of the national production of almonds, pistachios, walnuts, dates, figs, kiwifruit, olives, Clingstone peaches, dried plums, and raisins.

Notable Increases in California Value of Production:


Cherries, Sweet ……………………………….. 81%

Celery …………………………………………….. 48%

Onions, Spring ………………………………… 45%

Artichokes ………………………………………. 33%

Leaf Lettuce ……………………………………. 31%

Dates ……………………………………………… 31%

Bell Peppers ……………………………………. 30%

Cucumber ……………………………………….. 28%

Grapefruit…. ……………………………………  25%

Mandarins ………………………………………. 27%

Olives …………………………………………….. 88%

Raspberries, All……………………………….   20%

 

Notable Decreases in California Value of Production:


Chili Peppers …………………………………. -54%

Pistachios ……………………………………….-47%

Corn, Grain …………………………………….-44%

Cotton, Upland………………………………..-44%

Hay, Other ……………………………………… -41%

Apples …………………………………………… -39%

Apricots …………………………………………. -38%

Pecan …………………………………………….. -21%

The decreases in production are not so straight forward. It can be the result of other states or countries becoming more competitive and influencing the decline in California’s production. Growing up in Idaho, for example, I know that much of the hay and grain business or acreage has moved from California, given the high cost of land. Idaho is poised to become the largest dairy state in the nation ahead of Wisconsin. However, new Pistachio orchards seem to be springing up everywhere and California’s Central Valley, where 98 percent of all the country’s pistachio’s are grown, a -47% decline in production is most likely the result of production problems – specifically, pistachio shells turning up empty.

Related Posts

Wherefore Art Thou Carbon?

There is lots of talk these days about carbon and how to manage it, especially when it comes to carbon in our atmosphere. Over the centuries, humans have expanded their carbon emissions as societies have advanced, resulting in more carbon in the atmosphere which leads to climate change.

Supporting Plant Adaptation

It’s important to think about plants as being incredibly adroit at adapting to changing conditions and consider how we can best support them as they try to function efficiently.

Helping Plants Sequester Carbon

The definition of regenerative agricultural practices is evolving. In the beginning, my definition was simple: engage in agricultural practices that work to maximize carbon sequestration in your soils and do it in a manner that minimizes your carbon footprint. Recently, I read a definition of regenerative agriculture as a “toolkit of principles/practices to restore and preserve biodiversity and soil health by creating a functional ecosystem that reduces external inputs while producing nourishing farm products.” This definition begins to consider how carbon is cycling through the system, emphasizing supporting microbial activity and nutrient cycling. All good in my thinking, but how do we get there?